Human PerformanceLektion 34 von 38
34/38Information processing and decision-making

Decision-Making Models: DECIDE and FORDEC

Lesezeit ca. 4 min·
en
Sprache wechseln (DE)

Decision-making in the cockpit

Decisions in the cockpit are either routine (which altitude? which frequency?) or emergency-driven (engine failure, IMC entry). Structured decision-making models help to think systematically — even under time pressure and stress.

Aeronautical Decision Making (ADM)

ADM is the EASA/FAA term for the systematic approach to pilot decisions. Goals:

  • Avoid impulsive errors,
  • Consider all relevant factors,
  • Complete, documented selection of actions.

ADM building blocks (FAA model):

  1. Personal self-assessment (IMSAFE),
  2. Recognition of hazardous attitudes,
  3. Risk analysis (PAVE — Pilot, Aircraft, Environment, External pressures),
  4. Structured decision process (DECIDE / FORDEC),
  5. CRM/SRM application (see SRM lesson).

The DECIDE model

DECIDE is a 6-step acronym developed by the FAA for structured decisions in aviation:

D — Detect

"Detect that a change has occurred."

  • Which unexpected change has happened? (Weather worse than planned, fuel less than planned, engine anomaly)
  • Note the symptoms objectively.

E — Estimate

"Estimate the need to react."

  • How serious is the situation?
  • How much time do I have?
  • What risks are involved?

C — Choose

"Choose a desired outcome."

  • What is the goal? (Safe landing, frequency change, diversion)
  • Define a concrete, achievable outcome.

I — Identify

"Identify possible actions."

  • List options (at least 2–3).
  • Evaluate pros and cons of each.

D — Do

"Take the best action."

  • Select and execute the best option.
  • Clear, decisive, with standard procedures.

E — Evaluate

"Evaluate the outcome."

  • Did the action produce the desired result?
  • If not: back to D (Detect) — new DECIDE cycle.

Strengths: easy to memorise, fast. Weaknesses: less detailed than FORDEC; can become superficial under pressure.

The FORDEC model

FORDEC was developed by Lufthansa and is widely used in European commercial aviation. It is a more detailed variant of DECIDE.

F — Facts

"What is fact?"

  • What has happened (objective facts, not assumptions)?
  • What data do I have?
  • What immediate consequences are visible?

Example: "The oil pressure gauge reads 25 psi instead of 60 psi. Engine runs normally. Oil temperature normal. We are at FL 50 over wooded terrain."

O — Options

"What options do I have?"

  • List all plausible options, including unusual ones.
  • At least 2–3 options.

Example:

  • Option A: Immediate forced landing in the nearest open field.
  • Option B: Continue to nearest aerodrome (15 NM).
  • Option C: Return to departure aerodrome (25 NM).

R — Risks/Benefits

"What pros and cons does each option have?"

  • Pro/contra per option.

Example for A vs B:

  • A: Pro: immediately on the ground. Con: field unchecked, risk of obstacles/injury.
  • B: Pro: runway and rescue services. Con: 15 NM with possible engine failure en route.

D — Decision

"Which option do I choose?"

  • Make a clear, justified decision.
  • Communicate to ATC, co-pilot, pax as appropriate.

Example: "We land at the 15 NM aerodrome; Mayday call to tower."

E — Execute

"Carry out the decision."

  • Standard procedure, checklist, clear actions.
  • Aviate – Navigate – Communicate.

C — Check

"Is it working?"

  • Observe the effect of the decision.
  • On new symptoms or change: back to F (Facts) — new FORDEC cycle.

Strengths: very structured, demands explicit option evaluation. Weaknesses: time-consuming — too slow for second-scale emergencies; then use Aviate–Navigate–Communicate and emergency checklists.

Application by time scale

Time scaleRecommended model
Seconds (e.g. stall)Rehearsed emergency checklist, Aviate–Navigate–Communicate
Minutes (e.g. weather entry, fuel problem)DECIDE or FORDEC
Hours (e.g. route planning with weather)FORDEC, possibly with briefing

Common decision traps

Continuation bias / plan continuation:

  • Pilot sticks to the original plan even when it no longer fits.
  • Example: VFR pilot flies into worse weather rather than turning back, because "only 30 NM to home".
  • Antidote: conscious check "Am I sticking to the plan for good reasons or out of inertia?"

Confirmation bias:

  • Pilot looks only for information confirming the decision.
  • Antidote: actively seek counter-arguments.

Sunk-cost fallacy:

  • "I've been flying 60 minutes already, I can't turn back now."
  • Antidote: past time is lost — only future safety matters.

Pressing:

  • "I have to land today, the appointment is tomorrow."
  • External pressure leads to risk acceptance.
  • Antidote: PAVE — recognise External pressures consciously.
Fertig gelesen?
Melde dich an, um deinen Fortschritt zu speichern.