Attention, Workload, Situational Awareness
Attention
Selective — one task is chosen, others suppressed (cocktail-party effect). Divided — two or more tasks simultaneously; works only when tasks are in different modalities (visual + auditory) or one is highly automated. Sustained — over long time (cruise, holding); very error-prone in monotony ("vigilance decrement").
Cockpit bottleneck: the eye. Only a few degrees of central vision carry sharp information; everything else is peripheral motion/brightness image (see [[aufbau-des-auges]], [[visuelles-scannen]]).
Visual scanning — sector method
The most effective scan method (per FAA AC 90-48E Pilots' Role in Collision Avoidance):
| Step | Description |
|---|---|
| 1. Sector division | Divide horizon into sectors of 10–20° width |
| 2. Sequential scanning | Go through sectors systematically (left → right or reverse) |
| 3. Pause per sector | ~ 1 second per sector — brief fixation so the eye can focus |
| 4. Overlap | Allow slight overlap between sectors to leave no blind strip |
| 5. Repeat | Complete horizon scan every ~10–20 seconds |
→ Saccadic eye movements without fixation produce no sharp image — hence the 1-second pause per sector.
→ Collision-traffic detection: between recognition and initiation of an avoidance manoeuvre typically 5–10 seconds pass (reaction time + decision + control input).
Workload
Workload = ratio of task demand to available cognitive capacity. Both change in flight:
High ┐ ┌── Departure / Approach
Workload│ Cruise ╱
│ ╱
│ ──────────────────────╱
│
Low ┘
0 ────── Time ───────────────────
Underload (cruise, autopilot engaged, clear weather) leads to vigilance decline, microsleep. Overload (multiple frequency changes + approach + traffic) leads to task shedding (= dropping tasks): typical case is radio is noticed, altitude is not.
Measures: NASA TLX questionnaire, heart rate variability, eye-tracking.
Situational Awareness (SA) — Endsley 1995
Endsley (Human Factors 37(1), 1995) defines SA in three levels:
- Perception — what elements are in my environment? (e.g. traffic 11 o'clock 500 ft below, cloud base 1,200 ft)
- Comprehension — what do they mean together? (Conflict vector? Cloud trend?)
- Projection — what will happen in next minutes? (Does traffic cross us in 30 s? Will base drop below VFR minima?)
Loss already at level 1 is the most common cause of VFR-into-IMC. Level 3 is the hardest — requires mental model of the situation.
Maintaining SA
- Actively scan rather than wait.
- Speak out loud ("Altitude is 3,500 ft, clear to descend to 2,500") uses auditory.
- Trend monitoring — every 5 min once check briefing position.
- Checklists offload working memory and free SA capacity.
Pilot personality and behaviour
Optimal pilot traits
Psychological research (NASA, aeromedical studies) identifies a preferred personality profile in airline pilots and safety-oriented GA pilots:
| Trait | Ideal level | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Extroversion | medium-high | supports communication, crew resource management |
| Emotional stability | high | keeps calm under stress, avoids impulsive decisions |
| Conscientiousness | high | checklist adherence, procedure fidelity |
| Openness | medium | flexible to new situations, not rigid |
| Agreeableness | medium | cooperative without conflict avoidance |
→ Best combination: extroverted + (emotionally) stable.
Hazardous attitudes (5 dangerous mindsets)
The FAA in the 1980s (based on NTSB accident analysis) identified 5 typical pilot-hazardous attitudes. Documented in FAA-H-8083-25B Chapter 2 and AC 60-22 Aeronautical Decision Making:
| Hazardous attitude | Description | Antidote (counter-thought) |
|---|---|---|
| Anti-authority ("Don't tell me what to do") | Rejection of rules, instructions, authorities | "Follow the rules. They are usually right." |
| Impulsivity ("Do it now, fast!") | Acts without thinking | "Not so fast. Think first." |
| Invulnerability ("It won't happen to me") | Believes immune to accidents | "It could happen to me." |
| Macho ("I can do it") | Risk-taking for self-display; wants to impress | "Taking chances is foolish." |
| Resignation ("What I do makes no difference") | Passive, gives up, trusts fatalism | "I am not helpless. I can make a difference." |
Important observations:
- Macho and invulnerability often appear in combination — the pilot who "can do it" often also believes that "nothing will happen to them". This combination is particularly accident-prone.
- Show-off risk: some pilots tend to take unnecessary risks when they feel observed and admired (e.g. low passes in front of friends, low flyover of family).
Conflict resolution — active listening
In interpersonal conflicts in the cockpit or with ATC, active listening and reacting to arguments is demonstrably the best method:
- Truly understand the other's standpoint, not just wait until you can respond.
- Address concrete arguments, don't react emotionally.
- Keep the factual level — separation person/issue.
Flying skills — permanent behaviour change
Flying skills arise from a permanent behaviour change — i.e. through practice and experience. There is no "shortcut":
| Learning phase | Property |
|---|---|
| Knowledge acquisition | Books, theory, briefing — passive knowledge |
| Practice with instructor | Guided repetition; correction in real time |
| Solo practice | Self-responsibility; consolidation |
| Experience over years | Pattern recognition, intuition; refined decisions |
→ Skill decay: without regular practice, skills decline — even in experienced pilots. Hence EASA recommendation: 12 take-offs / landings per 90 days for currency.
Mental training
Mental training — deliberate mental walk-through of procedures without physical practice — improves flying skills at all levels:
| Practice what? | Method |
|---|---|
| Emergency procedures | Walk through engine-failure sequence in chair (5–10 min/day) |
| Approach procedures | Study approach chart + fly mentally |
| Radio phraseology | Mentally repeat standard calls |
| Pattern and crosswind | Visualise correction inputs |
Effectiveness: mental practice activates similar neural pathways as actual flying (sports psychology: Feltz & Landers 1983 meta-analysis). Especially effective before new procedures (e.g. first crosswind landing) or before demanding flights (e.g. new airfield).