Aircraft General Knowledge — AeroplanesLektion 9 von 55
09/55Piston engine — four-stroke Otto cycle

Carburettor vs. fuel injection

Lesezeit ca. 1 min·
en
Sprache wechseln (DE)

Piston engines use either a carburettor or fuel injection to form the air/fuel mixture.

Float-type carburettor

Classic system (e.g. Cessna 152, older C172):

  • Fuel is atomised by a venturi using the pressure drop.
  • Float maintains a constant fuel level in the float chamber.
  • Main jet meters fuel into the induction air.

Pros: Simple, robust, low maintenance. Con: Susceptible to carburettor icing (see §2.5).

Fuel injection

Modern system (e.g. C172S with Lycoming IO-360, DA40, Aquila):

  • Mechanical injection (Bendix RSA, Continental TCM) — servo measures airflow, manifold distributes fuel via individual injectors per cylinder in the intake port.
  • Direct cylinder injection (rare in PPL trainers) delivers fuel during the intake stroke.

Pros:

  • No carburettor icing (no venturi pressure drop + evaporation)
  • Better cylinder-to-cylinder mixture distribution
  • Higher specific power

Cons:

  • Vapour lock possible (see §3.4)
  • Hot starts can be tricky (residual heat boils fuel in the lines — AFM procedure)
  • Induction icing at filters or manifold in visible moisture still possible → alternate air / carb heat function provided
Fertig gelesen?
Melde dich an, um deinen Fortschritt zu speichern.